M. Meade
we ought to criticize
I think we
this
came
-A
we
have more than once told the Governor to strictly follow the Rules, which are already very favourable to the Police, and not to give them favourable treatment
are still more
the rules
not warranted by them
See also 82004
8.W. Imag
Commit this; for in despatch on 540 we said that!
divatters
Ok
Could we not put it that, if this man had been definitely given to understand that he would receive a pension of $583.96, Lord Knutsford having regard to the powers possessed by the laws of 1907 state would not interfere; but that he felt bound
point out that the proceedings bore nothing by the regulation - to explain why we considered that a pension of 40% to a man retiring at 45 in indifferent health
decreed, after 17 years service was not justified by
ingardia received years ago.
I see that in the despatch on 25549/87
"We had the words "not exceeding "inserted.
for the purpose that there might be some
"latitude in dealing with cases, were not
of recent date!!
AM 4/5
mero
2/5/98
to the
plausein granted Contrary rules
8u91575-
N. 89.
My Lord,
307
0.0.
8411 RECR Red 25 APR 91
Government House,
March
Hongkong, 24th March
I have the honour
to inform Your Lordship that
on the recommendation
of
the Acting Captain Superintendent of Police and with the advice
of
The Right Honourable Lord Knutsford, GCMG.