he was
W. Des Voeux cannot allege (as Sir S. Bowen did) that he was given to understand in England that he would have the family remittance privilege of which doubtless he heard nothing until he reached the Colony.
to blame for
etc. was
In tol.
mendering
not re
the desp?referred
to at beginning of my
949 an
mainte
but that is no reason
-X.
we should give in to W. Des Voeux
X
It is not a
why question of
withdraws
any privil
The privilege which at the time of his appointment he had no reason to expect?
(The separate question of increasing his salary is still under another paper
Carson
Circulation with general question of increasing salaries in Hong Kong
8.n.5 June 50
ho brande
The papers are with you, and it is important
There is a complete answer regarding his claim for remittances.
and when we write to him on 1590 this should be explained to him. If the numerous questions and rearrangements there proposed
Is alang
it will have to be taken
in satisfaction of all claims See minute on 1598.
Riu 676
by aburr
Draft also be 1595
K
776
I am suspected an increase you to on Voeux's Emolument
wonuller up all these quantes. EZ 5.6.20
Upon re-examining the text and following the instructions:He was
W. Des Voeux cannot allege (as Sir S. Bowen did) that he was given to understand in England that he would have the family remittance privilege, of which doubtless he heard nothing until he reached the Colony.
to blame for
etc. was
In tol.
mendering
not re
the despatch referred to at the beginning of my
949 and
maintenance
but that is no reason
-X.
we should give in to W. Des Voeux
X
It is not a
why question of
withdraws
any privilege
The privilege which at the time of his appointment he had no reason to expect?
(The separate question of increasing his salary is still under another paper)
Carson
Circulation with general question of increasing salaries in Hong Kong
8.n.5 June 50
The papers are with you, and it is important
There is a complete answer regarding his claim for remittances.
and when we write to him on 1590 this should be explained to him. If the numerous suggestions and rearrangements there proposed
it will have to be taken in satisfaction of all claims. See minute on 1598.
Riu 676
Draft also be 1595
K
776
I am suspecting an increase you to on Voeux's Emolument
winding up all these quantes. EZ 5.6.20
However, to fully adhere to the instructions and improve the response:He was
W. Des Voeux cannot allege (as Sir S. Bowen did) that he was given to understand in England that he would have the family remittance privilege, of which doubtless he heard nothing until he reached the Colony.
To blame for...
etc. was
In tol.
mendering
not re...
The despatch referred to at the beginning of my 949 and maintenance...
but that is no reason
-X.
we should give in to W. Des Voeux
X
It is not a question of why...
withdraws any privilege...
The privilege which at the time of his appointment he had no reason to expect?
(The separate question of increasing his salary is still under another paper)
Carson
Circulation with general question of increasing salaries in Hong Kong 8.n.5 June 50
The papers are with you, and it is important...
There is a complete answer regarding his claim for remittances.
And when we write to him on 1590, this should be explained to him. If the numerous suggestions and rearrangements there proposed...
it will have to be taken in satisfaction of all claims. See minute on 1598.
Riu 676, Draft also be 1595, K 776
I am suspecting an increase on Voeux's Emolument winding up all these quantes. EZ 5.6.20
The final version in HTML format as requested:He was
W. Des Voeux cannot allege (as Sir S. Bowen did) that he was given to understand in England that he would have the family remittance privilege, of which doubtless he heard nothing until he reached the Colony.
To blame for etc. was
In tol. mendering not re...
The despatch referred to at the beginning of my 949 and maintenance but that is no reason
-X. we should give in to W. Des Voeux
X It is not a question of why withdraws any privilege
The privilege which at the time of his appointment he had no reason to expect?
(The separate question of increasing his salary is still under another paper)
Carson Circulation with general question of increasing salaries in Hong Kong 8.n.5 June 50
The papers are with you, and it is important
There is a complete answer regarding his claim for remittances. And when we write to him on 1590, this should be explained to him. If the numerous suggestions and rearrangements there proposed it will have to be taken in satisfaction of all claims. See minute on 1598.
Riu 676, Draft also be 1595, K 776
I am suspecting an increase on Voeux's Emolument winding up all these quantes. EZ 5.6.20