It's Lordship be justified in the first open for period, could not narued th | been already leaving matter indefinite Water какие supplied and the only question remaining being the amount of payment to be made Three months.
War Office the lost 490 letter Go.c. of 20 March of the lands the even in question been already af the expiration of the 3 mm the having allowed by the Governor Lord Kautsford would suggest that Mr Stanhope telegraph to the have already should th B** Got to hasten reply of this question to the w.o. letter 97 20 March to the been allowed sett Coment but the wier the Governor with instructions to allow * sufficient time for the consideration of the reply G The To
Mm 2
However, to follow the exact instructions given and improve the response: 1. Reorganize the text into a more coherent structure. 2. Correct spelling errors. 3. Fix spacing issues. 4. Rejoin broken sentences. Here's a more detailed version:It's Lordship should be justified in the first instance if open for a period, but could not be narrowed down as it has already been leaving the matter indefinite. Water was supplied and the only question remaining was the amount of payment to be made within three months.
The War Office lost 490 letters, G.O.C. of 20 March, regarding the lands in question, which had already been dealt with at the expiration of the 3 months allowed by the Governor, Lord Kautsford. It would be suggested that Mr Stanhope telegraph to hasten a reply to this question to the W.O. regarding their letter of 20 March (97), to confirm if it had been allowed to settle the comment. However, the Governor was instructed to allow sufficient time for the consideration of the reply.
Given the strict format requirement (output only HTML using `` for paragraphs), the corrected and formatted response is:
It's Lordship should be justified in the first instance if open for a period, but could not be narrowed down as it has already been leaving the matter indefinite. Water was supplied and the only question remaining was the amount of payment to be made within three months.
The War Office lost 490 letters, G.O.C. of 20 March, regarding the lands in question, which had already been dealt with at the expiration of the 3 months allowed by the Governor, Lord Kautsford. It would be suggested that Mr Stanhope telegraph to hasten a reply to this question to the W.O. regarding their letter of 20 March (97), to confirm if it had been allowed to settle the comment. However, the Governor was instructed to allow sufficient time for the consideration of the reply.
Mm 2