The case
Cron
off the
The solicitor Cable
is allowed Paris. Practice) was
(who is
not specifically mentioned in despatch.
in 1598/89-90
and he has according
been given 35% rise from
$2400 to $3240.
?Let it stand
the Straits
(In Sol. Gen.
at
fer
was raised to $45400)
As we disallowed the proposed increase to the Chaplain
on same grounds
? Disallow the increase Clerk & Sexton
the 2nd Clerk in the Treasury
Salary $1440 & pers. all = $18720 (which latter in my partially
explained in Enc. 9
treated in same way
Then rightly
then ha
ar
Clerks referred to in pr. 6 of any
much above:
1.5. the increase (this time 20%).
$1440
the
then fixed pay in 1875-
to $1728 from retains his pers. all.
infill
W
2nd Clerk in Surv. Gen" Office ? Ask why he has been raised 20 per cent above 1889 rate instead of above 1875 rate
meanwhile
sanction the
latter, viz. $1296-instead of $1440, & similar hasta 4
to
t-Clarkin
this def.
+
Pee
$360t
432
20144/81
In Sept. of Money Order Office
Post Office
was not in existence
till 1885, but in view of the other increases in higher posts in this office I think he may be allowed what is
"per cent rise? proposed, viz.
full
Two minor Clerks in
Magistracy
are
Magte
h
A
$14
created till after not wieder 1875"
which may
given 20 per cent - I think stand with ard
A
The 5th Clerk in Treasury
formerly 3. Clerk.
in 2.0. at $81320,
as (see 18610) reduced from $11320
was
to $61080,
a
punishment,
luntar
Said (en 18610/90) that he might
nevertheless
Comming
get the 20 to wh.
to other Clerks
They have now
given
lein $1440
which is 20 percent on $1200
Clerk in A.0.
(the 1875 pay of 2 Clerk in
then no
? Say
3rd (lark) -
that an
meaning
should get 20%
$1296
Int
wa
there
that he
#todo, i. E.
(Otherwise his
punishment is reduced to very small
Many)
In Ass. Interpreter, Sup. (appears to have been created in 1879
& the small rise in his case from $1800 to $2000 may
stand?