Thanks (I think) thank
Dispose of
they exist
than they like.
Unclear this view is sure
(And I do not know how for it is affected by the "general"
it would be strenuous
accept the provisions of the
(2+
would have been in
Sniping in all following to have
The Militating hand valued credit the [Journal?] with the addition on this account to the
Corregonde
See. w.o.k
mith as p.us of H.
W.o. memo
Contribution leaving all questions of surrender of sites and provision of fresh over the settle
m L.s.d. on the basis of the relation might be the Militating Contribution apprenant. But I suppose it
/
a too late to think of their
4.4-28
Mr Brackeston
26
42
M. Fleming's point put shortly is that in the Colony
a building.
a Jurisprudential note
is to pay or be debited with the full value
it
ought
to be credited with the full value of any new site which it
has to provide for new buildings -
as in Stone Ring
New buildings. This is fair when as in
The New sites may be valuable, and I think we have already done so,
it
in one
>
•par. 7.4 Margin or
your Strutting letter 125.0. It amounts substantially 23915/89 & the same arrangement
as in the blocks of researther desp. of 27 Jan' 1864. There the Colony paid for buildings & Provided the due site Now the Colony is paying for building and site, but claims Mr paid for
2.
the new site. Put this to W. 0-
-
•
But W. Fleming hardly grasps the other half of the proposal when a new site is not immediately required he claims (from. 6) that the der render Sold stones revert unconditionally to the colony; or from the last cork. I fear, des., & look at the purpose as if the colony were red paying dear the Value at one. The only condition is that the value shall be ascertained but there not be payable unless at some future Time Military requires
Make
further buildings necessary - Explain this
Former shooting - These Formighting-
3. Par. J.
Roanh don for they geom the W.0