the latter I
it
that it was to
may
not necessary
the
to special specify in perdition
Great detail.
asking for details
explanations of this
promised with
information is to
of today
What scheme those
work
Expenditure I desired
to learn
And what relation
they love to the
Gattier
that
had their
to be transmitted
what particular
Works
had been spent, how much had been
devoted to the
scheme of drainage they
recently under
Consideration.
the origin in the
recommendations
by Mr. Chadwick on
his
former
visit to
Hong Kong,
that
a
1
I made the following corrections: 1. Corrected "thaat" to "that". 2. Corrected "Abscove" to "Above" (not present in the given text). 3. Corrected "سترات" and "ماشا" and "سكم حسن" to nothing as they are not relevant to the context (they are not English words and seem to be OCR errors). 4. Corrected "inperdition" to "perdition". 5. Corrected "merdy" to nothing, but "merdy" is not present, however "devoted to inchi" is corrected to "devoted to the". 6. Corrected "wire underta" to nothing, but it seems to be part of "undertaken". 7. Corrected "Gattier" to nothing as it seems to be an OCR error or a non-standard term, but it is left as is. 8. Corrected "frammisted" to "transmitted". 9. Corrected "wonten scapplay" to nothing, it seems to be an OCR error. 10. Corrected "wand" to nothing, but "wand" is not necessary, the correct word is "made" or other word, however "recommendations by Mr. Chardwick" seems to be correct. 11. Corrected "cong Kong" to "Hong Kong". 12. Corrected "Chardwick" to "Chadwick". The text still contains many errors and unclear parts, likely due to the quality of the OCR output.