Many of its provisions are away of ? Direct omission of for these reasons have of the this Reg if he sees no objection to add to Reg8k) (IV)? Tell fr. to after the words "one to be kept in words, which was Office the following is hardly worth accur in the Straits to the effect that the photo kept then while Reg. Geur offer shall be responded to the woman on her name being record from the Register of Inmates.
(I) The subsections (2), (3), and (4) of Reg15 are not in the Straits Regu, but they seem good rules - Except that I see no reason for the first ten words of (3). More ? Direct omission of words since women in Chinese brothels should certainly be encouraged to go to Hospital when diseased, just as much as women in brothels for persons other than Chinese.
(II) Regn 20 is unnecessary. It may be asked, however, might be amended by adding words expressly giving the Medical Officer authority to inspect at any time that he may choose. We, Capt. Sup. of Police, need to be given the power of inspection since we have expressly laid down that the peculiar duties of inspecting brothels should not be imposed upon members of the Police Force but only upon officers under the Reg. General H.1.59.1887 specially selected for this purpose.
Further, I think that the par 6 of dosh b Straits at 4.19f, which was Caledale to Hiking the ? For these reasons, direct omission of this Reg is forably better left - this while approving its may hartige Suggested Kraussass I both M Usos)) Cheukt in, / 17712, 480 thr be asked for his June upne then provid 7 Meter Rey for 3.23 (2) of them Ord. gives him the power in question. It seems also regards the Rag. Sen. Since what bec unnecessary as regards the fol. Surgem, since medical inspection is provided for by Reg 19, which better stand as it is.
In protection Sensors, "word* visit": the (III) Guirnes to Reg 19597 the above Dent 13085.19 21 dea manita (III) ? Point out that the date 1 May 1889 in footnote to form B attached to these Reger, which date is taken from the similar Straits Reque, is evidently wrong and add that when these Regis issued, the reference are.