#p100 [which W-Lockhart inserted in the Draft Ord

don't know why-

dec

last wordt.

of his memo. attached to 2.

22417109]

? Leave the penalty as it stands, which

sufficient.

seems to me

/

? Sanction the Ordinance making the remarks suggested above & on 18604.

Me

Ay & the Regulations, the

(I) has.3

eins/;. 2. not as in Straits Raz

re as follows: viz.

the words "And an

in (C) and this whole of (f)

"

Iden

are her

I need not be objected to ? (II) hrs. 6(2) the underlined word,

are new, but so far

•Carried

"

a^R

The words

quite right.

But the last proviso giving the

Registrar General power to refuse, Cavell or suspend registration seems to me ultra vires.

If such a power

is to exist, surely

it ought to be given by the Ordinance

1859 pars than

Shav

(as was done by the Ord. 19 / 1887 5.27/3)) "see annexe. The Protective at the Straits regrets Report for the absence of this provision from the Straits Law the Evidently does not contemplate the possibilit of reintroducing the power by

beaut

Regulation. Notwithstanding what is said in pars. 3,6,7 of this Straits Report of the It aits Protector, I do not think such an unqualifie

36 3

power can be given to Mm Reg. 128 General, since it simply has the effect of turning the whole system of registration into a licensing system, this buispoon such as Existed before, twhich in par. 8 H. 1.242-1850 of desp. of 3 Jan. Cast we

to be mohained.

7.319

said wa

not

The danger feared by then

of Chinese appears to me

distinctly

to be sufficienty

The Right will be bothblay mat by writer of this

lece knoon with ods

39 (C)

Fame from unit 1.25 of 2. 35101167-63a 30 this Httery Order [1.14 of the Straitions] objection to shingut while in cases of suspicion befuchand hm of closing dinding the Reg. General has the further Lowers of requiring security under I do embe ss. 14&15 of this Ord. [1. S of the Straition) ] ? So inform fr. directing that this proviss in the 8th Regube

M.5712

omitted.

I Jam also disposed to think

the provision of

that Reguy should (if it exists at all) be in the Orditself. "manth But I think it should be omitted, angular fention of times having the Effect of licensing fe - Sorry head scrunch

37 (11545/ Steering

A

shablishments a

unes the rest of the certain pergans (1.5. those who

can furnish securities) to keep Wothel. The provisim Leems

se unnecessary for

won how this, it inly worked as Ra Amet it will not primus & licensing

88.5/12 K

any

ther object,

A

the Ordiname

provides penalties for breaking

Share This Page