M. Wingfield
will you glance at this -
1. Admiralty fees - he shares Law Officers’
Colonial-
2. Court Briefs when the Crown is
They are successful
I suppose this must be conceded - though I think
who also gets his work
-
Altogether like it - for the women. Schieffelin may be embarrassed
the litigious Fus of Min
3. This Certainly
A
who got intended
the omission in our
standing
telegram I incline to refuse the
A.G. These fees; especially if we give him his Briggs
✓
appeal
2.
81 295
I would follow
the rule laid down
in the Leeward Islands, penala fetter and (or repeated future law officers) Trinidad that neither the Attorney General should receive costs in Civil actions from
any litigant
3. I agree
-
AL
It is unfortunate that the telegram omitted to day to fees but I don’t think Mont
the prospect of possible official pressure
with Mehendirman in
considering whether to accept
or decline the appointment
Japex.
q
EW 21 May
Trinidad 20
accepted the appointment if confirmed 316
that there would be no
have
been attached to it
tiem
James and fur henn
as
persons in the Wiffelli
Meet May 22
I agree with do Wingfield-
K
2315
W. Wingfield
Hi Goodman has asked to see
the passage in desp
1598/89-9
L
(par. 12(5)) relating to
his salary - He has been informed
that that desp
circulated
has been printed
here. not been ans
We have
He understands that his salary was
fixed at the rate which made $747,300
because that
the rate at the
Straits (see minutes & desp.
7800
Lo
Ex
1856/89
but he complains that this A. G. at the Straits also has some private practice (see minutes 25053/88) viz. that of Counsel but not of Attorney, wishes to ask for
increase of
salary. Should we send him copy of desp?
have weighed
In
A
con un formare would have greatly
Ar