Lanction what has been done in M. Denison's case

by Sur

but the non-compliance with instructions from the Sec. of State does not invalidate a contract made by the Govt with an individual - The Govt must answer for its right of instructions.

the S. As & the

govt's action - I am by no means

satisfied

that the premium system is a bad one - In 1875 during a time of depression the Crown Tenants made a great fuss about their rents & wanted a reduction, but a Commission of which I was chairman resisted (Nov. 12.75) against it because the

rents were below the amounts for

which leases were abnormally

granted.

I argued that the rents of unoccupied lots would not

bring back the prosperity which some think they would have, if refunded. I have little doubt that distress then was due to other causes. Since

Depression

of one kind or another we shall have similar petitions again in times

of difficulty, & they will be more

difficult to answer.

I incline to retain the existing practice, which gives the Govt

discretionary power to commute a premium

in individual cases -

as in Linison's case, whenever for particular reasons he thinks it

advisable.

I am sorry to have kept this as long.

Precisely what W. Branston proposes. Personally,

I should be inclined to a system of higher rents

& lower premium, but the present arrangement

appears to work without friction at Hong

Kong.

When Swire met A. Clarke out reformed

the Land Regulations Art. XII. which states that Landgrants shall be in conformity with any

Instructions from the Sec. of State as the Govt might properly act upon. My minute referred to General Circular 88.46

Page 174

has been kept as is at the end, assuming it follows the original format of having three lines at the top and three at the bottom to delineate page metadata, though the exact lines are not visible in the provided text. However, since the task requires maintaining the original page numbering format, it is left as is. Here is the revised response in HTML as requested: No change is made to the above response as it is already in the required HTML format using `

` tags.

Share This Page