ground that by that time the five years will be completed. This however seems contrary to the 8th Rule (in 19397/68) which distinctly lays down that the time on leave cannot count towards this five years' period.
I think he is strictly not entitled to the passage to Heshing. Either from and as laid down in 21680/26 we must be chary of making exceptions to the already favorable rules affecting the Police.
? Seem to say Governor, in lending should not be refunded until tw. E. the point of returning; and tell us? that the matter has been referred to the governor, whose report receipt of which further communication will be made to win, and add that it is not clear that he is strictly Entitled Even to the return passage, but A Hein was been promised kein in the (oling the S. Mtate does not propose to prohibit that).
End 27/9 242719 28/9 Riu 28.
this letter out, but ask him to Consider dreport, whether, in view of the fact that the Leave granted to this man presumably on grounds of urgent private affairs, there would be any objection to the free passage, es being both ways on allowed on the understanding of course that the five years period be completed after his return to the Colony, before the next five years. Will En El Hans if this is done the cost of passage to England