that it had no little; merely
mention that the view was
held in their department,
I think there printed a
put forth considered the ti
Cellen for off in its mercantile
shape.
ES7
6.2.
90
Our position is that military authorities have only a right of occupation of such lands of
which they have not received a Crown grant & they now
Mauritius
admit it. See The Land is vested in the Queen
1865
like all other Crown Lands, the Governor by Letters Patent
"Surely
Wen
450
has a general authority from the Crown to dispose
Them for
of Crown Lands - and the Governor is the only
X
person who
+
Can
gir
a title & Com Lords. The
Governor's authority includes Militia Crown Lands
Stay Kny bags occupied by the Military, but as they have an inchoate right to occupy, he cannot Exercise his power of granting
Khin a title to them until vacated by the Military-
34 Coral
Statente.
Est
? is not " in burst.
# Leve
indefinh
Lands purchased with army funds stand in a
Different footing altogether: They
are not (as above) vested in the Crown Queen but in the Secy of State for War, & the Colony has no interest in them unless they become vested in the Governor by Order in Council under the Colonial Fortifications Act of 1877-
It is to this latter class of land that the second alternative in dut. 2 of 32 & 6 of 1860 refers_" land used by - A.B_
"'in trust for H. M =" is a description which does not apply to
Military occupation of Crown Lands used by the Military – "in trust for H. M." is a description
in this case, as
not the legal estate is in some person who holds it as
that the legal estate is in some person who holds it as
occupying is concerned H.M; but the lands in question (class above) are
already in H.M.
&
Funstor
- for a legal estate in fee simple, & The Military use them by permission from the Crown. Such lands are not alienable by the Military, for they
are mere squatters (i.e. occupiers) can not "squatt in theast" for Austin. 957
who has
Cannot alienate what is vested in the Queen, Only authorised the Crown & drdo - then for Section 4 the Ordinance does not apply-
M. 14/2/90