2.3.The Correspondine e
closed in Jur Enclosed
letter
does not include the
letter off the May 1889 (in reply to which
the
Tol.
Lec. wrote his
letter of 23th May last) and it does not therefor
appear whether that
letter clearly defined the "certain portions of Garden Lots at
Kowloon" to whichst referred not 4. In
Durg
Care
it
seems most probable
that the Col. Sec. in
using
The phrase " thes
remainder of the ground"
DRAFT.
Mr.
Mr.
MINUTE.
Mr. Wingfield.
Mr. Bramston.
Mr. Meadle.
Sir R. Herbert.
Baron de Worms.
Lord Knutsford.
404
was unaware of Either looked
the fact that the
Garden Lots of M.
Humphreys
were
included in thin.
A ground referred t
is the letter which he.
gustin,
Cy
was ausing
Else
overlooked the
fact that M. Humphreyshots had been excepted
Comence
from those to which
Building Leases were granted in
1886.
44. Ropier
J
Som Cetter will of this letter in reply however be referred however
दै