• Col. Locork.
? by.
Put fud 619
M. Bramste
多
athen $769,8
See Col. Locock's note annexed
the letter with same slighte
my
returning amendments of certain figure He has however misunderstood point; I wished to make sure that.
5,29,30,65871 for
M. Humphreys farden Lots which Mis Surveyor General
to Nov. 19 L
1887 declared and
no
building
h
lease had been issued, were in fact identical with the Inland Lots Nop. 412, 522 853 64which
were issued in 1886.
leases
I don't believe that M. Humphrezi Garden Lots above name dare included in these Inland Lots (though then the patirtys Col. Lec. does say
the growed") july the remainder of
because the A. S. in his reports way. 8°
Plays
that questizie of
very explicit wty W Humphrey,
was still under discussi
in 1887 + so
Cofold not have been the baldag teacher granted
granted in 1886.
Isubmit drafts for
Eu92619
*
Konuy
A
Headley
Jefs. 10/85
374
request
Jan
flak
&tai umel action.
Yours fault fully
Rococh
letter about certaus
4/42
Kowloon, Hong Kong, regained for mublary pupores.
I have bee
leave for the last monthe-
I have been ups
7
Kough
London 3 times to do a
B
lags
at the office, I have
work or so of the
found
gail accenn
much a
" pile of papers waiting for