DRAFT.
258
General (see his note
art
par.
6 geht Runell's
letter) that there
is no re
-necessity for
providing for
the
a.
airect
apeal from
either in addition.
ti
or in substitution
Foter
as
the right to an
apply for
swort of
a
habeas corpus ;
5 I consider.
se that the Chinese
#
proceeding. It
extradition from
Mary Kang
to China,
as they are in pro-
Extradition Act 1870.
-ceedings
under the
64.A
regards
Extra
-dition
Sall
offences,
sufficient
reazarr
to depart from the
decision laid down
in Lord Carnarvons
Sort may reasonably
expect that authenticated
}
depositions
aath
taken in China should
be admitted in evidence
in
Despatch No 26.
o the
Jellarch 1876. that
The Schedule
Cuines
o
should not include
crimes under
D