!
}
༔
by projecting it further seaward, it appears that, for other than Engineering reasons, this proposal
must be dropped. In that Report it was stated that objections to the suggested modification
" may possibly arise on the
"
spot, which are not apparent
from the data in
my possession,
: judging however from the
documents transmitted from
" the i
Dolany,
the
question is one
" which is des
deserving of consideratio..
" by the Colonial Authorities.
3
+
I cannot but regret
the conclusion which has
com
been arrived at more especially
in
溘
བ
135
in view of the fact that as
appears from paragraphs 4. and 6 of the Surveyor Generali Report of 6th August ullo a length of wall, diminished by
th
165 feet, would have resulted. in an additional area of 16 acres of land reclaimed which
additional area is situated in
front of the most central and important part of the bety".
4 With regard to the Surveyor General's remarks on the fourth recommendation in my Report of December 1888, Iam decidedly of opinion that it would be a wise and proper
course