a correct copy
2. Meanwhile there is no ne
necessity
to send Enc. I or par. 1 of their despt to 4.0. but
? Send to W. O. copy of despts (except Enc. 2, with reference par. 1) and of to their letter of 2 Jan. Cast (163) and on letters of 16 Jan. (m163) + 26 March (on 6013) - and say that apparently padangeland akrids bwatakanin Julyed o
taste and Lots 263 three's the arrangement
par. 2 of our
om desp. to suggested in par.
frv. (on 163) [communicated to W.0.m
16 Jan.
been
1887.
and
last) had already
July 18
carried out in
مهرم
ask W.0. whether all that is
necessary Sffectad
d
has not therefore
been
fected as regards these lots.
send copy your letter to W.0. to them for. 3. This despt relates to restrictions
on the letting of
Marine Lots near
the Belcher's Fort
but the despt.
which it immediately answer (in 9673/
arose out
lands
of corest" "concerning
in the Hills which in the
Event of
A
Enemy Landing
in the
South of HtKey might require to
-X. viz.
265
1931/20 16104188
26217/87 hed at
bundl
be occupied for military purporis and I do not think it is quite
clear that the fr.
realises
that such lands are not to be
704
let without restrictions similar
und
البدل
to 2 4 3 of those specified in
Enc. 2 (possibly the 1st may
Unnecessary
They
with these sites
be
are not in the neighbourhood of gunpractice - but the 5.0.(. would have to be consulted)
It will be seen
from
that the for. in writing
W.0.
16104/88
his
despt. 4972/88 had confused
the Hild sites with the Marine dbali & I cannot Lots
discover from a careful perusal of the subsequent corresp. whether his mind has on the point. been suice cleared
(I take blame to myself for
the despl 16104/80 drafting
so as
to refer to the twos ects of.
comesp. instead separate desp.)
The confusio arisen from
writing
live
has probably
telm
2621/1973