44.
for
i
claim
of
for the sum of $ 328,
that a mount, representing
the total amount
paper of the
securites they had hypothecated to
8,000 do
security $828, 07
guarantee embargo
Nor
476
security for the
a
formality which the
Spanish laws deman
nd, and
which they
cannot give
12.0
They
He Bank
ignoring
their debt to the
Bank of over
$250,
250,000;
this latter $250,
the Judge refaced to admit on the ground that the Bank had no legal status in Manila, and had
Me right to sue for the same .
to the best
According to
legal
opinion the above embargo is Megel:
1. Because Jurado & Co : could not
prove their claim.
2.
Jerado & 6: had lodged neither
guarantee
litigate against the Bank "pobres"
Ao
In the Bank in
5. Because although
legal
the Judges opinion had Status, the Bank has a decided
right to appeal from the decisiou, but the Judge refaces all affecal,
and threats tthe Bank an
existent
The embargo
Jorv
made on
the
16th
of
March in
an un Nea
n necessarily
The
Bank's
public and violent manner,