3
454
!
half pay, upon medical certificate.
உ
for
Mr. Russell applied
three months' vacation "leave; but, as he had taken
one month's leave in November
last, his application raised a similar question to that
in Mr Malsch's case.
on
!
which I addressed.
you in
my despatch No 120 of 44
instant, and I have
accordingly only granted him
two months, and informed
him
>
9671
him that I would refer the
~
question of the additional month for Your Lordship's –
decision.
3.
Mr Russell's contention,
is that one month's leave is
owing
to him
for
the
year
1888, and that he is entitled:
to two months for the current
year. He further states that when the judges gave up the regular vacation of the Supreme Court, it was understood that they were
to