E
subject has no
mile a
ui a
arvised
legal right to themand cortipuate wither in the U. H
Along
all that the 2.0. in whe was that though formal official certificates of British citizenship would
Mjeti in be obfictionalhes there would to no
br
to "permitting the local Brilest autherite es & testify
the fact of a porom
lestie their bilih obitel sabziel
being
C
There can
natural bomn
I think I ne derelt "that the Sof
sak Lan
State can modify the permission pour Gher
wither prevally
any particuler Medreefor
Along
or is to any particuler class of persons I to mit knows why these Chinen Bilish subjects
to Siam do not apply for Paps parts which would to equally effective with the forami artepedes of Blich
Ew
29 hit
Anfurther winderation
be
may he spared,
1 Korica
rather than of law, whether a
Jourmer
Itimit the Coffin as it is often all a question
thand refuse to grant certificates
I'morced thancfore, wild flusson has
Supper hand
K 3013
N 42
olby Lord,
0100
139
Government Fouse,
4th
Hong Hong, 416 February 1889.
With reference to the
Puke of Newcastle's Circular despatch of the 25th August, 1862, relative to the certificates to be granted to persons
requiring
The Right Honourable The Lord Huutoford, GCMG,
to