the
1
? Copy to 7.0. with reference to 24502 (sending also copy of Circular of 25 Aug. 1862) tray that 2nd Kuntsford proposes withe
nce to Lord Salisbury's concurrence inform the for. that HM. Sw!
of Minim that he should not decline to issue the certificate case where the proof of. broth in Hunything is quite satisfacting
are
in any
To proued - of
Jud23/3
5793.3
the Siamere Goverment
Exempt Chinese who are British reljub from certain texation why shened not
Anything I raided
Chinese born as
with the means of parring British subjects
that they
[ The English claim that the children frequens born in British demencins
in
axA
7
Britest Helgrets is not recognized by all other nations - 2.5. Kance I
EW.
23 March
à 'am depond, after readily they despalet
< in vichomes to bel, with the Swomen, my
1
dustful shelter or shall not be doing
great deal of mischief and abetting evasion
i.
138.
of laws & regulations by gromy
afification of British nationality tothenimen Sho happen
ben boin th
shan
British Fil. Protally,
the case of Clunein wissens uti australia, such certificatis
Cheg
peely transferred and sto, and
word by Meers than those to When they or consede that ine granted
manus of man
When
China
G
it
inted when friendly freige fovemmenti
that wr
should thus umpede them.
in maintaining
Case L
order
Itemch the questen would to this pritten consideration. better for comm
Send to Law Offices with the printed papen of 1862 & this dis patch I ask if the Governor can properly refuse to grant a certificate in a case where the person applying can prove that he was
Hong Kong & that his parent, wen not
born in
alien enemies. I do not see how he can well-
refuse
"You
K2713.
The Circuler
алк
at
1862 we
liberty to giv
merely permissions,
Statement" or Is it quite & a portion In the 2.0.? there can
--
h no
donk Bat a
Bibi