If appointed here he somere, I conclude han his passage paid
I think or always accepts the Jugis nomination
in for his
Clukotif,
Whisnet
a
confidential position
* adort of
Privat Sealy K Judy
Eastern Opt.
Is hasual
80.2115
in sinta
AMA
Da Does the suretany
of late interfere with these appointedl
without
The
insulting the foverears
M. Braunstin
HW. J 1/6/65
?
question whether these app to
que
under
should be approval of moly the S. of State is in some
Λ
confusion. I cannot find that we have ever
been consulted about their Purisne
Judzés
Clerk at Haughing,
last afft.
in 16213/
ev
approved
-
but the
smiply reported in Schedule / M14
& Putty. The swemer made
that appointment, as also
then last appt. of the Judge's Clerk (ie. the Chief Justice's) see minutes on
o 453
453/83-4 Pout the last case of an appointment of Iudze's Clerk made in England
wak
(mhar
Agg
413
approved by the Sec. of State &
free passage to the Joling
a
allowed as in case
wan
fall under £500 face
perman regular Civil Service
appointment, under £500 3662
22563
7
passage
also 1798/r
was allowed to
a
where
aff in he had gone out from
the Colony, on ground that England for
sake of getting the appt)
On the other hand in the Straits such appointinenti are mat
in the gift. regarded as purely.
of the Judges & carrying right to passage, a to pensis (see 3945 & 10618/67)
th
Jace that the new Hangkung draft Pensim Reque except Indzei Clerks from right to pansion "unless they Jermanent establishment for
words to that effect);
of the app?
S. Mtate,
Pare
ame
approved by the
does it not give
Mem
?A
some claim to permanency ought to be cleared use of they actually selected by the Judze farly formally approved by the Sec. I state or fivernor, I presume
are