{
subject of much previous discussion & correspondence.
I am inclined to
think that the Ord. of
1876
went too far
making
L
it a penal offence
to use hämnt.
ov
Le
07
found in a house fe teft for public plazing gambling," but I am ch Pinion that ther
that the new
Ordinance could have
contained a provision
Similar to 1.7 of
the
Straits Ord. To 1888.
of which a copy
Enclosed; and
in
و
have to mistruct gu
to introduce amending Ord" in
that sense.
330
Itake this opportunity
& referring zon
no. 149 of
my
17
desp. n.
the August 1887.
d requesting zu
Consider whether
any other legislative changes
Lane
shold at the
time be adopted
the disceden accordan with the recommendations
of the formatter of the hecatin
Council there referred to, and
Especially
frendering
in the direction
the owners
of houses liable for their being used as Public
Horses Samthing