30.
31.
228
at 3/f in 1881,... £325.0;
at 3/5° in 1885.
a13/12 in 1886,
a13/12/4 in 1887
£30. 15.0;
"y
₤27 150;
£28·2·6.__ ₤282
• bagainst this, the men who
declined to accept the increased.
rate of pay
are in this position :
3
5 of $480 is $ 160; and that
remitted at par is equivalent to
£33, 6. 8, which shows that the late zecom
#
who rejected the incrca ze pre
in a much better position to-day than those who accepted it. ]
After considering the question
in
have compe
and sandbaby the other rif.
Which the
✡
differe $40
in all it bearings I find it impossible
ن
as I had hoped, to devise a
:lisfactory solution in an extended privileges of remittance
*
oet par. • Any euch conecosion, umless made sufficiently general
to be
a practical increase of all salaries would give rise to end less discussien and heartburnings; and I am reluctantly compelled
to the conclusion that there must
be either no relief at all,
uniform.
Case
increase
of all officers
or r
of valcery
alory in the
in
the Service.
The