depositions
Taken in China
admitted in
vath
should be
Evidence iiner
proceedings In Extradition from they thin, as they
are
in Proceedings fr
under the Extradition Act
1870.
5. As regards Entradition
Crimes offences,
Kuntsfral sees no
to depart from laid down Canged in J
the March
Bord
sufficient
hearn
the decisio
the
Communicated & you "letter from this Dept.
that the
12 Juny 1876, Schedule of crimes should
not include crimes under
the law of China which are not crimes under the Camer
of Hongking motherine
it would be no
necessary for
the Reagistrate to leave'
ins
any
tur
Case
für a
demand
515
extradition of a persuni
charged with such an
to have evidence of the
law of China
44
to what
constitutes the offence
Forkout for charged but his I
Hold therefor
that they
not be prepared Lordsding theintes
Schedule might at crony
to allow the
last five of
ten
the additimal
crimes proposed
sato be as wide as the
Schedules of
the Extradition
to be added in the Acts 1870 +1873.
Draft schedule which forms, Enc. 36 th
from desp.
235
no.
6. Lord Kuntsford
therefore would propones with Lud Salisbury's Concurrence, & that the Draft Ord. " " prefered best in 1875 & pubmitted to the 7.0.im Dept. letter from this defl. 1: 11th Jan. 1876 (and
of
Enclose)