detention of his
of his opium legal expenses.
2.
I learn
that the
and
from your desp:
fine has already
been remitted with the
one dollar.
exception of one
?
I cannot entertain
claim on account
the defeation
of
of opium, of
on account of the costs
any
no
of
the appeal to the Supreme fount, which would seem to
have been ill considered.
as there concre be bisht no dinst that or techinnal breach of the love have
but as
the case
as regards the "
in the magistrates count,
Seeing
that it more
clifficulties
the offence resulted from
mout
fun commuttur
advice given by of governme Officers, I am of opinion, consider
>
I think So
the more
M: Bramst CRE Not in this path
that the costs should be 411
defrayed by government;
-expirerally
as
I gather
from Mr. Ewen's letter that
a communication addressed
to the
by him on behalf of his
intervention
was
client, asking their to stop the prosecution. not answered, although it refered to a legal matter
as to which an an diber
might reasonably been given
3.
have
should cause
You Has substance of my
decision to be communicated
both to M- Ewens
addup
med X
having feettimed Secretary of
this
State,
as
the
and