339
refers
*
to; but, if the settlement of his claim to tension was "De Hams primary object, it is strange that neither in his own letter, nor in
31༩༡་ཨ7;L
ecieretary
that of the Colonial Ser (Mr Austin), nor in the Governor's minute is there any reference to Pension.
5.
I can only day, therefore, that if 2
that if DreAdams really desired to have his
claim considered, it is
unfortunate for him that
he
Enclosure & 26th Novemb
1874.
he made no written reference
to it. I am almost driven to the conclusion that he hesitated to broach the subject openly, and hoped to secure "his object indirectly by
getting his name
placed
Yo the Fixed Establishment.
I have the honour to be,
elby Lood,
on
Your Lordship's Most Obedient
Humble Servant,
GuderVaul