594
! but N225 copy of Ordinance was enclosed 25 was no doubt by mistake. A copy 7726 of Ordinance as passed by the Legislative Council was the however among papers enclosed in No 383.
Your despatch you 3. I presume that have not assented to Ordinance No = 26 in accordance with the opinion of the Acting Attorney General to the effect that "as the Ordinance makes an increase in the number of public officers &c :)" "it should not be assented to until "Her Majesty's pleasure" "Thereon has been signified.
4. I am advised that clause 22(3) of the Royal Instructions on I presume that Mr Ackroyd's