robbery
crime
other c
having been committed
mitted the
lower Officials had at the risk
of degradations to find
No eviden
a culprit.
400
against the accused
10
reason for identifying him
if he w
not the
party
would
der.
guilty
do
AVAA
ever prod..
eced
ace
the late
there has been.
1-10
that the
ae
veed
tvaý
tracted
iis support of this defence.
J.
the person
they sought to obtain was said
to be
a notorious murderer
and burglar, and one of his
accomplice
crime
th
Authorities were most
anxious to
secure the real
the first
ad
person who the witnesses
identify, yet in this
case the same
set up.
Ide
defence
lvad
In all ordinary
cases it is expected
that
admit
this
without some
proof.
defence without
likely that witnesses
It is not
who
could have
a grudge
againet
for
allegations
political purposes or because
Oct.
He was
rich
that he had
offended some of the higher
Officials. The defence was
not guilty.
that
the Police
Authorities had to find
a culprit.
This is inadmissible
and I repeat, looking at
the position with regard to China,
the
ease
with which it
may
be reached
the
is
it often
from and to retrieve
their plunder