224
not crop
Mone
as she incriminated
Nanind as
of the prisoners. As to the declarations
which we forward His Excellency will see
they from the dates upon which they
that two of the witnesses the Dr Farny Sin Jenn
and the landlady Lak Kai ding
were examined
afterwards in the hearing of the
case before Mr. Tuacheau in which
Chinees Leony fellow the bliness
Li La
And
thandarim and his principal
at the instance
were charged with
of perjury
Am. Dennys. These two witnesses were
cross-examined by Mr. J.J. Francis R.C.
appearing for
the defence
and their evidence was in
no way
shaken. It
was at the close of the examination of the landlady Luk Kai tung that the magistrate
directed by the Attorney General
to stay proceedings against Li Loi without any legal authority
and there then being sufficient
evidence before the magistrate to
justify a committal
for trial before the Supreme Court of Crim. Dur. Dennys did not see any necessity for calling further witnesses but had the Woodchance
J.
allowed to be called as a witness for the defence of
Leong ate to have been called we
Were