the spin on the A. & S.G.
quite in accordance with the recent judgment of the Supreme Court
& Drug Kong.
that the proof of guilt required & the
Mesto Tientsin as
57
the condition o
Extradition must be submitted to and judged
by the magistrate is
X
But reasonable grounds
frow of some bill
might to be sufficient such for example a lame bitt & Then it would lead a grand jury in the country where
the evidence is exparte auf
Endall a
with on such as both sides would ind me a magistrate
to commit for that.
Mach
10. M. Frut Luv admitted in
corespondence with the Marquis Tseng that
"proof of guilt does not mean such absolute
Morg
would
cmeritin
6 recepury
to suffer final
" I think the Colonial Govt should understand the
of the view taken § I. M. Govt of this the duty Magistrate aayilafame in these cases. Por letter adtuge 5 too shands onder to the J Magistrates in Peking sembodies that views the Magist
trate's def and it is interis
interig brie end of the judgment of the Supreme Couch-
on to the dus of the former - ci wakat
whind the magistrate's pedant
Extint he should fo
Aus instructim's have not hea de clear and the opereins of the L. Om are somewhat conflicting. but the fore- notwithstanding the opinia gli Abortster stiffrent - upheld the reperal tho
to intradite Elevon persons who had hea committed by the magistrales succesiit – the Froomer in lumil sus being satisfied as of the proof of guilt.
I don't whether we
PL.0.
ady
came get much more
Ew in Aust
a gustation from a pre openemy 2 (der to Atheri Land Faltome Ofir R Phillin
Vezzz.
mclosure /
2nd May, 1887,
Copy dry centy
Sir,
14371
RECP
FEGE27 JUL 87)
212
Government House,
Hongkong, 20th June, 1887.
I have the honour.
to enclose, for your
iZ
your consideration;
letter and assompanying
documents
nine subt 7th finelosures. losure 14 with
thEnclosure,
Penyns
7th May, 1887,
Right Honourable
from
Mess ro
and Mossop, Solicitors,
Henry J. Holland, Bart, M.P. Kemy,
Ye
with
Ye