sand in Grothels.
who have entered with thin agreements
are
living
ang9 June 87
153
I think for med not regim
The addition
of
the proviss. for
take on
as it is illegal te kup young childer in brothels we may kidume that the Registian General will not give them back to their Custodians in order to be Rypt there; d if it is neupany to day anything upon the point or upon the agruments - which for cannot do without implying that the Gout
are or may be carslys almat this was very important howk of the foes his B it will be smongt in danctioning the Ord
I day that. Si H. Holland Jakes the fore points for granted -
but I think we rund not gaise within.
The ord as is so different from the draft that much of M. Johmwin's Minuste in 46444 is in applicath _ boot Jagur with him that when I will
athand
a definiti decision upon the Principles
an come to it will be disirath this in the both at Stonything on the Straits to direct them to collut all the
law of the protution of young girls into one Ord
upon
This
Sanchin this Adam with or (2) withhik
the observations and to absor
873.15/06/07 Must Jum 15
Selection with this brewvation. But I feel no provision
for placing these young girls anywhere, tunden bay May 18 Tory ordinance this difficulty is met, I
Me
Draft on th CA. Ord Sug
Mich
a copy other
SS. Minance.
thand I went tott kory tattention called traction 7 to.
WTH
147/6/57
Sir H. Holland
As to this last point, see,
wo.
of Lord Stanley's desp. Lep. 1885 [p. 29fene.
"the rules
par
51
5(4)
1912
in 4644,
the Socies" there
referred to will be found at p.115 of
C-3185-1882.
I have drafted accordingly
witte
see also
4.
reference to that. But W. O'Malley's reference Std. 2
p.30 of muc. in
Asto
to this point on
par. beginning
1644/87,
clause Lefi
Su92516
Here is the corrected version in HTML format as requested:sand in Grothels.
who have entered with thin agreements
are
living
9 June 87
153
I think formed not regime
The addition
of
the proviso for
take on
as it is illegal to keep young children in brothels we may presume that the Registrar General will not give them back to their Custodians in order to be kept there; and if it is necessary to say anything upon the point or upon the arguments - which we cannot do without implying that the Govt
are or may be careless almost this was very important work of the foes his B it will be strongest in sanctioning the Ord
I say that. Sir H. Holland takes the four points for granted -
but I think we cannot goise within.
The ord as is so different from the draft that much of Mr. Johnston's Minute in 4644 is inapplicable _ boot Jagur with him that when I will
attend
a definite decision upon the Principles
and come to it will be desirable this in the both at Singapore on the Straits to direct them to collect all the
law of the protection of young girls into one Ord
upon
This
Sanction this Adam with or (2) withhold
the observations and to absorb
873.15/06/07 Must Jum 15
Selection with this reservation. But I feel no provision
for placing these young girls anywhere, under Bay May 18 Tory ordinance this difficulty is met, I
Me
Draft on th CA. Ord Sug
Mich
a copy other
SS. Minance.
and I went tott kory attention called traction 7 to.
WTH
147/6/57
Sir H. Holland
As to this last point, see,
wo.
of Lord Stanley's desp. Lep. 1885 [p. 29 fene.
"the rules
par
51
5(4)
1912
in 4644,
the Society" there
referred to will be found at p.115 of
C-3185-1882.
I have drafted accordingly
write
see also
4.
reference to that. But W. O'Malley's reference Std. 2
p.30 of muc. in
As to
to this point on
par. beginning
1644/87,
clause Left
Su92516