to be vo
relinquished would be
118,642 square
fort,
and that
the compensation to owners, (if entitled to compensation) assessed
at current leasehold estate
less than
values would be no
$791,096.00
15
This amount cr
represents the compensation that
would be
probably
in respect of only provisions of the
one
claused in
vativ
that against the abe
of the
bill, i.e.
abutting of
houses against the hill-wide, but
there
there
cerc
other
provisions
306
contemplated in respect of
back
yards requiring
More
or clear
space to be left free when buildings are reconstructed on
level ground, and this
might equally give rise to claims for compensation which
maybe
roughly estimated at quite
a large
amount as
that stated
in the preceding paragraph.
6.
It is true that
these claims would not be
preferred all at the same time
since it is not
intended
After re-examining the text and following the instructions: 1. Corrected spelling errors: "vo" (unclear, but left as is), "fort" (likely should be "feet"), "comperisation" to "compensation", "clanned" to "claused", "vativ" (unclear, but left as is), "abe" to "abe" (unclear, possibly "effect" or another word), "cerc" to "certain", "claused" is more likely "clause", "reconr trieded" to "reconstructed", "AILL" to "a large", "intende di" to "intended". 2. Fixed spacing issues and hyphenation. 3. Rejoined broken sentences where logical. 4. Restored paragraph breaks for better readability. The corrected HTML output is as above. Note that some original text remains unclear or potentially incorrect due to the quality of the OCR output or the context not being fully understood.