or (2) that taking the evidence as a whole it fails to support the conclusion arrived at by the magistrate.
But His Lordship thinks that the Governor in Council should in each case weigh the matter with great care and differ from the magistrate only when he feels constrained by a strong and clear opinion so to do.
His Lordship presumes that the Governor in Council acted in that spirit in the present case. There seems reason, however, to believe that the prisoner is an old offender.
It is not unlikely therefore that the evidence to be adduced against Twin on the further sixteen charges of Piracy, which it is stated are hanging over him, may be sufficient to justify his extradition.
Mr Marsh's letter Coffelen & Jespatch is returned herewith.
May 25-86