345
explanation
allegations which he had
* for declining
ing to
...
in reply
tw
subordination
the charge of
and disobedience
Cz
of causes were not
not satisfactory,
that since his return
ill health."
which Dr Ayres
reported to duty
(it LUA sheuv that there had
(on 15th November) "no
been two
only been
examined.
LA Ar given,) bodies
to be
to ico health
has been
221 ade srivee
che by Dr. Wharry
either verbal or
in writing.
that he had continued
6th indent the
to reprise orders given to him.
dma i t the Co
carry 19. That
informed shal the
That he consider whether he
suspended he accordingly
Council would sherved
be otherwise dealt with,
Dr. Wharry gives
ath that "over
"and stress of work
"effect L Than Co
exertion.
NUTY take nuch
·readily in part you ro, and
yea internal warnings of
when cry "Shavi ew
upr to submit
"the danger J Y
tred "to tv-v mich.
21. That his defence
in writing and
that he might also
deferr appens himself orally.
20. That the Bond Nove rober
Dr. Wharry informed the
Officer Aduriniuuring the Government
in reply that
his role were
the 26th November 1886, Dr. Wharry forwarded a
statement to be laid before the Executive
Council, in which document
Dr. Wharry says it is
forr Puru Av