lo.
7.
230
defendant when he attacked me. I had
him
after.
hi
before.
Invever
I never have been in the
" village of Tcho Kio. Jam one done's
"walk off Icha Nis, the
Icha Kio, the village defendant lives.
It
#
was the
where
the following evidence
that made me think sto a
Yik
had not been brought down as a : witness against the present defuidact ; for he says: "The allandarin told me
4
" Cheang A Chi was in Hougtong. The Mauariu did not vay defendant " in Houghong. One of the Sing Sam
"told me.
Byling Sam
eves
Mr Mackeau tells
sue was meant some one ab cr
of the Chinove
Ewen's Office Government Police or Officers.
"No
"I would
d see
" to one told we. Mr. Ewerstold me
defendant in Court.
"
With respect to these and other
took
contradictions in the evidence Mr Mackcan told me he carefully too down what the interpreter said.
The cvidence on
this point should
be compared
and convidered with that
of
See a On. He
says:
"I have known
"
"Ho Yik for 13 years ." — Ho Yik says
that it was
passage
only
when he took a
in his boat that he became
acquainted with See A On .
Su a On continues : __ "Ne.
to Hongkong together;
OCLAMAL
; we did not
talk about the case, I had a talk
we will go up
"with him. Isaid " to the Police Court, try the case,
"the
CARE
до
home
after
Now