J
377
the
} 3.
#1
"This
• judgment that the lease, as
issued from
wrong.
hie department, is
In support of this
alleged wrong he states that a
#
Еслас
in
was
し
granted to him in 1884
the ordinary way through the
Land office, of which Mr & odchroyd, then also Registrar of the Supreme Court, is the Land Officer." Some
dispute arising about
the boundaries of the land referred
to in the said lease, legal
proceedings
were taken against
Mx
Mr Stephens by the owner
- of
adjoining property and a judgment. adverse to Mr. Stephens was given
by the Chief Justice. Odgainst this decision Mr. Stephend states that he appealed, and that the appeal was heard before the Chief Justice and M. Ackroyd, then edeting Puisne Judge who dismissed his
appeal.
H
by enquiry
Now
C for the facts disclosed
do not at all bear out
Mr. Stephens' complaint, for Mr
etchroyd went on leave to Australia
Dy