}
ear Sir,
0.
48955
390
p. 28.1885
You will remember that
few days ago I referred to
a
private expiry of
J. Pauncefote's resp. the
·
ver of the Sov? of Hongkong
fardon prisoners.
W. Wingfield has replied to
1
question,
& it appears that Letter of Oct. 8 does not
1