orders; and that the Ordinance so construed
is not inconsistent with the
Treaty
JN?!. That in the present cou
This
thee for after consulting Exec. Emmeil was not satisfied
that there was
guilt
a
such proof of
require
bin to
surrender the prisoners
and he accordingly discharged them; and
emsider that in
Hoe gou emsider
taking
this course
he acted
in accordance with Muni-
cipal Law & with the Treaty. 8(5) That the Chinese fout appear to be under a
misapprehensio
as better
an
in which the
investigation was conducted. That the additional Evidence
DRAFT.
MINUTE.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr. Wingfield.
Mr. Bramston.
Mr. Meade.
Sir R. Herbert.
Lord Dunraven.
Colonel Stanley.
was taken by the Magistrate in the presence of a
Solicitiv representing the
Chinese for
? who cross-
388
Examined the witnesses called in support of this
prisoners, & who called Vexamined additional witnesses in support of ther
charge; and that
Bisle of Raimondi took no part beyond instructing
4-4
soicita
Lower to appear for the prisoners.
7(6) That HM. [or cannot
admit the contentin
J
the Camere for that in
the fugitive
Extradition cases
should
b.
not allowed to produce
before the musporteate wvidence tho rebut then
charge
thand the Migestrator