case, was
allowed
to interfer
volunter widence in
support of the prisoners, Whilst the Chimmere Gount
were
not grin sportimity of being
counsel at the
AL
head
at the investigation,
even informed of
the
that evidence.
y
ต
nature
of that
widence
which the
Governor
ii
Cancil deemed
sufficiently important to
outweigh
ly
♡
مام
that adduced
the Imperial Gour
authorize
to
Excellency
His
override
273
override, not only the opinion of
the magistrale, but also that of Hmm gout; for, it cannot be supposed that they did not entirely concur in the opinion of the magistrate, as to the sufficiency of the coridence of criminality produced by the Chinese Sort, when Sir Charles Dilke, in the Name of H. M. Goo! undertook to order the Sarre.der of the prisoners in 1882. But, whatever may been the nature of the coridence
4 did
have
presented by Bishop Raimonds, the dimperial govt contend that it's acceptance was irregular
a
an
• based on-
misunderstanding of the real nature of
Extradition expiry. Du Extradition cases the Court is not called on to try the fugitive criminal, but to declare Whether or not, the evidence
adduced
/
in support of the demand
his extradition is such as to justify
for
belief in his probable quilt. The prisoner.
is