Її
"an
Anim
Ordinance, bok
Can will of amor be bakery be
conquest you
I have
to cause the draft to
O in
be first comparing with
Ordinances no.
3
J 807 1882 F
1881, no. 80f no. 9 of 1884, din order
that there may be no inconsistency between those measures
Law.Ardinance.
the new m
3. Jobserve that the
draft follows the
To charly that Straits Ordinance, by
copying
the misprint
"so be " at the end of clause 1; by using several clause the
Appears in both, that
term "Peace off Officer "
is
which, eo for as the Lee Jam
so
aware, is not
Hangkung
found in their
and
499
Ordinances;
by introducing the term
"rijovou
ov
is intinducer
Comment
准
sunfle impri- which
"clause 9,
is suitable to the thraits
Harshing. Settlements, but not to thanking 4. I also request you
to refer the attomey ferend
& Thanks Ordinance no. 6 of 1885
(Copy of which is enclosed) passed because
which was
the fort of that Colony found the forum Ret other to keep the
had filt
X necessary
reluvc
(olary always under Procla mation, in order to keep alive the power of Deportation, which might be required
emergency, for which the
othe