& clearly. I take them
bill shortly & charly.
Clause I
I
"
4
There is no
definition glohat
should constitate reasonable grounds
Suspicion "
I
"
I do not see some definition should not be
formulated.
d the attor
attorney general's
business to help to frame such
definitions
I think the furvision confers
- mach arbitrary power
+
the RG "with hom
as
336
mmittee: Cannot
consulting committee
Some fronsion to this effect be inserted in the
bill?! the
difficulty
is
that Auld this
Society has not definitely appeared as yet any ordinance/exter are as tode to take See page 1986/24/16 31858)
fah
in
but there is no reason
offencin
too
As
до
to be exercised
with at the exfequced of publicity by
妆
the Registrar General.
"But is it not possible to provide
these safeguards? M: Russell
Certain members
in his report p.8 suggests that
of the Chinese Society for the protection of
women
2 children should be associated
why
C-3185-82
161201844 not it should
come into the present
am aware.
ordinance, as
as four
Hadsels." It does not say what shall be
done with the person
Jecurity
is not
dr
Athe child if the
and indeed
not fouttecoming
it is difficult to see what could be
done in such case
there is reasonable sus/
Suspicion
and
if
اللهم
great tymay
reasonable security cannot be given. I should have thought there would be no in talking away (assuming that he or she is not the parent)
the child from the person