is based
uper
37
And Common's "My predecessors
AAA desp. n. 3
f12 april 1876, and
that desp.,
when read
with desp. no. 18 of 19
which is
Tab. 1876 referred to in
it, shows that it was not meant to treat Po- licemen in the matter
of Family Remittances
ma
different footing
from other Civil Servants.
The instructions contained
in those desp
were
superseded by those
predicessor w
Dec. 1881, which
given in my desp.
175 of 20 Dec. clearly inflies that
Policemen
are to be
2
treated on the sa 8?
footing ar
way
in the same
as other civil
servants, except in so
as their agreements
far
entitled them to special
treatment.
3.
Such was the
wintentions of ung preds-
Seson's deaft
desp. on thin Home C
subject, but I am bound
to admit, that tht as M Deane foints out, the clauses in Police agree-
ments,
which relate to
remittances,
have
в
oversight been
move loosely worde than was intended,
and
that consequently Policeman
Cannot now be compelled to remit in Equperiodical