Concil; and that H. th. fort
Cannot admit that this for in bound wither by the Treaty or the dial Ordre to accept the opinion of the magistrate as conclusive expecially when further widence, is
fortherning after the magistrate
has committed or
discharged
the person whose extradition
is sought.
3. As regards the nature
of the "proof of guilt" "intended
by the Treaty Lord Derby thinks
fes
*
that it
be
шај Conceded, that it does
not mean "such absolute
froop
އބ
would ben
несенот
to support a final conviction,
and that it
it may
be said
that in the case in question
Attomes Senoud
wher
2. Kwok a Sing Law Rep. 5P.C. 199 sxpression the judgment speaksy prima facie svidence is used in the "Judgment
332
the fovernor & Executive
Conmail
were not satisfied
that there was presumptive
proop of the guilt of the
Eleven accused persons.
4. The Marquis Teens
might be informed that
an
these grounds H.M. fort
must decline to order
the rearrest of
fugitives
the eleven
5. Jam to take thing Opportiunt, with reference
to the last paragraphe
of your latter of the 19 ult respecting thinece
the Straits.
extradition from Settlements & from Hking,