Marquis Trany should be told that the Extradition
ศ
1873
Many
Arts 1570, do not apply to the China-
that the Treaty of Tientsin dous net prescribe the manner in wheel the question of the peod * & juilt required by art. XXX out that H. Mr. Gutt connect admit that
o the heat
رہا
is wh
There on farmed
X
either
the Cotmail Adinance to enext
conclusive expecially
the opinion of the magistrale
4-1
when further lindince is for theeming after the magistrate has committed
where extradition in
Dy
Discharged the person
sought-
as gard
the nature of the proof & quilt intender w the heaty without I "depporn that it magh
I conceded that it doves hit mean
nels abrilute proof
x du
AL
Low thap 58.57 where the judgeme
wuld be necessary speaks
and that it may June Jenne
to support a price Encrition
I said that in the case in question the first
aus m. (concil
are not sateised that there
"was presumption proof of the filt of the 11
accused pers.
fot
pportunit
[ If it is true that the Chemise authenties had no of rebatting the further eindran haught before the Eni Anant
I have a reasonthe ground of complaint.
витрар
ow that point without seeing They)
They decen
and it magh but to fap
rother in resching the site we the reavest o
in the frowned, décline
The accused pences.
Ew 5.1
X
Ingen bat at & we might add that Section 3 of the Mimani to
if there affian Which Manguis Tory refers Emporre. The Imagistrate effeccatifying
to him to be Installa Cause for believing the person & han committier the Offene to commit him to prison & instil the Jader shall reccior some other
Gister
from the Governo relation to the
discharge
the
& the farther
detentions,
374
- Kansmission pouch person" the Chinace Authirties; that Governor before dinding & discharge prisoner stund Committed by the magistrate,
Cammy
hate, Would Naturally
Consult his Council, and that de (as in Grevine Mint )
131011
I agree.
Keut Jan
D. Jan. 18.
JZ-
གེ - ::་ བ