12.
13
451
in particular, no such certificati was sent with the Private Bill of 1871 (to which repeated reference in made in the despatch from the
Colonial Office),
nor nor with the me
Private Bill entitled "The Tramways
Ordinance of 1885, forwarded with
902-83
my despatek ne 111 of 18th June 7051502080
L
ultimo; to neither of which Private
Bills was
Jany
objection whatever
taken on this account
this account by
Colonial Office?
5.
X
the
འན
I dare not conecal
from
"See decretary of State to Governor, W. 168 of
15th August 1883.
13502
from Your Lordship that comments have been made here on what is
considered a somewhat unhappy, though, doubtless, aveidental ~ coincidence - viz :- that objection
should have been taken by the
Colonial Office
by
the
on the ground of th
omission of the above-mentioned...
formalities apparently for the first time when an Ordinance in
which Mr Butheley Johnson is
concerned, was transmitted
for
confirmation. For that gentleman
has on more than one occasion
Jublicly