On 5802/83
he
says that the
observations should be analyzed again
as
the data were somewhat scanty:
he was asked what expenditure would be incurred in addition to the amount
already authorized, and this letter
calls itself
the answer:
It seems
to
the
grieve
gone before
to all that is
I would propose to
ask Mr Chadwick
whether all his previous figures
be considered as cancelled.
that he wants us
to go through to 634
Crown Agents in and to Rotat
change for this additional auth.
In that case
dues
Palops with as
but the agents
eschews the attr
and we devise tam & put to
matter before the Roberts
atm
Rm
foment!
Suggestions may
Ga
28.
8. May
I infer from what Mr Chadwick
said when he called here
at this time
31/5