drawn pay from other appointments held by them. Major Palmer also, & probably Lieut. Cox'
X X + judging from the drew they acted as A.D.C. part of the period during which Army pay at least for dates B Cirenla the su Lieut. Cox in May 18
But for the future (per Circular of 26 July 1881) an A.D.C. will have no Regimental Pay; thence it may be necessary to increase the Vote for Private Sec (and A.D.C.) by an equivalent to about £200 as stated in this letter.
In Mauritius there is a single vote for the two posts of RF 4,000 Z which lately R: 3,000 has gone to A.D.C. but ins Z. R. 1,000 leyle there are & Priv. Sec two votes R: 5,153475 to A.D.C. and R. 3,000 to Priv. Sec"; and in the Straits $2,400 (with horse allowance) to A.D.C. and $1,4416 to Priv. Sec?
To Mental Shark Hareshang then to make two separate votes, or merely to increase somewhat the present single provision, leaving the Governor to divide the amount according to his discretion? 631
verse from this letter it would seem that Sir G. Bowen would propose to give an A.D.C. £200 $1000, and say B but perhaps he is not aware the last rule about Regimental Pay, which might make that amount not enough to attract an Officer. Wernatiteld By S.W.I. 18 dan. & un. Jon 18
It must be remembered than an A.D.C. usually lives entirely at the Governor's expense, which adds £ £200 is doubtless better than a subaltern's position in Barracks - It had better be a separate Vote of $1000 Ind. D.C. In the first government might for his private secretary the whole of 2440
Sir Geop arriors yes. a. Dc. 7 Bowen may interdner the rote when tem Js.18/1 separate vote of $100 1000 fr For Of Bowon prefer not ho han bact