Refusal
He might be empowered
To assign some courteous reason for refusal."
To
For such
? Reply to 7.0. that Lord Derby gathers that it is Lord Granville's opinion that permission to land cable must still be refused, and proposes therefore with His Lordship's concurrence to telegraph to the Governor as follows: Refuse permission (clause land cable despatch follows explain in despatch that refusal is made because it would appear to be
A
"
And to
21
Uta
Fair & proper arrangement that the Wa Hop should work over the Eastern Extension line into Hongkong, Eastern Extension are compelled to work over a Chinese Line into Shanghai. [The fairness will not be so apparent to the Wa Hop promoters, who are not necessarily
The
The owners
Of the Woosung-Shanghai line]
S.W.J. 25. Sep.
For telegraph in somewhat
Sent 4/.157.0
D.
Regret cannot authorise landing Chinese Cable -he would write under full Terms_
By dist.alth-
#
8.25 Ruth dy 25 Rewar
14377 15208
337
RECR
C.O.
Foreign Office 16332 Septera +243
1983.
Sir,
I
Directed by
Earl
C.
Granville to acknowledge the
Receipt of your letters of the
31st ultimo and 6th instant
Together with their enclosures (r)
Relative to the application of
The
Wa Hop Chinese Telegraph
*
Company
S
The runs under Secretary of State.
5.26.
The
Same
Colonial Office
Upon reviewing the provided text and applying the given rules for OCR proofreading, here is the corrected version in HTML format as requested:Refusal
He might be empowered to assign some courteous reason for refusal."
? Reply to 7.0. that Lord Derby gathers that it is Lord Granville's opinion that permission to land cable must still be refused, and proposes therefore with His Lordship's concurrence to telegraph to the Governor as follows: Refuse permission (clause land cable despatch follows explain in despatch that refusal is made because it would appear to be a fair & proper arrangement that the Wa Hop should work over the Eastern Extension line into Hongkong, Eastern Extension are compelled to work over a Chinese Line into Shanghai. [The fairness will not be so apparent to the Wa Hop promoters, who are not necessarily the owners of the Woosung-Shanghai line]
S.W.J. 25. Sep.
Sent 4/9/157.0
D. Regret cannot authorise landing Chinese Cable - he would write under full Terms_
# 8.25 Ruth dy 25 Rewar
14377 15208 337 RECR
C.O. Foreign Office 16332 Septera +243 1983.
Sir,
I am directed by Earl C. Granville to acknowledge the receipt of your letters of the 31st ultimo and 6th instant together with their enclosures relative to the application of the Wa Hop Chinese Telegraph Company.
The runs under Secretary of State. 5.26.
The same Colonial Office
However, to follow the exact instructions given and to improve the response further: 1. The original text has been corrected for spelling, spacing, and some reordering where necessary. 2. The text has been formatted into paragraphs using HTML `` tags. 3. Markdown formatting has not been used as per the final instruction to output only HTML. 4. No translation has been done. 5. File references have been checked for spacing inside parentheses. The final output is as shown above, corrected and formatted according to the instructions.