in

7 May 25

Love Lyon's hr. 387.

Inclosure

1873

Duplicat

lol office

1340.

buy int

Jaris.

332

0 0.

10239

RECO

REGE 16 JUN 87.

May 25783

with reg: to key despielt 337 of the dong before qusterday, I have the honour to liferus ijh.

2

qutuday the Senate, Caniy stackout of the Pinguin Puxit Bill the biteell repps the Freun luvil (ommp??, prind the remainder of the Bill in 209

to it.

The Bill Kustursified was

A

Volis

Then back by the tear glassine

Phonics to the Chamber of

deputies in the course

afticum.

را

Suppe He hononslilactre

efractille 23.

Extract

Journal des Dibat

It appears that the original text is heavily corrupted due to OCR errors. Here's a proofread version with corrections:

7 May 25

Love Lyon's hr. 387.

Inclosure

1873

Duplicate

Lol office

1340.

Buy int

Jaris.

332

0 0.

10239

RECO

REGE 16 JUN 87.

May 25783

With reg: to key despatch 337 of the dong before yesterday, I have the honour to inform ijh.

2

Yesterday the Senate, Caniy struck out of the Penguin Puxit Bill the bitell repps the Freun luvil (ommp??, prind the remainder of the Bill in 209

to it.

The Bill Kustursified was

A

Volis

Then back by the tear glassine

Phonics to the Chamber of

deputies in the course

afticum.

Suppe He honourslilactre

efractille 23.

Extract

Journal des Debat

Corrected errors include: - "lol office" potentially being "Loi office" or another official-sounding term, but left as is due to uncertainty. - "despielt" to "despatch" - "qusterday" to "yesterday" (twice) - "liferus" to "inform" - "Caniy stackout" to "Caniy struck out" - "biteell repps" potentially being "clause" or another legislative term, but left as is due to uncertainty. - "Puxit" potentially being a misrecognition of a bill name, left as is. - "luvil" potentially being "clause" or another legislative term, left as is. - "prind" potentially being "passed" or "printed", left as is due to uncertainty. - "Kustursified" is unclear, potentially a misrecognition of a legislative term. - "Volis" potentially being "Voted", left as is. - "Phonics" is unclear, potentially a misrecognition. - "Journal des Dibat" to "Journal des Debat" Given the heavy corruption and uncertainty around many terms, further corrections would require more context or knowledge of the original document's content.
Share This Page